From: | "Martin A(dot) Marques" <martin(at)math(dot)unl(dot)edu(dot)ar> |
---|---|
To: | Franck Martin <Franck(at)sopac(dot)org> |
Cc: | "'Tim Kientzle '" <kientzle(at)acm(dot)org>, "'PostgreSQL general mailing list '" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | RE: Using BLOBs with PostgreSQL |
Date: | 2000-10-10 12:15:34 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.10.10010100911350.868-100000@math.unl.edu.ar |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Would it be difficult to store all the Binary data in a seperate
database ( a special database ) that would contain one binary object per
row with the obious information?
My 2 cents. :-)
On Sun, 8 Oct 2000, Franck Martin wrote:
> PG definitively lack BLOB support and it is a big drawback...
>
> Even with PG7.1 with TOAST that will remove the 8kB limit on records, there
> will be still no BLOB support.
>
> As you have indicated it seems that PG chokes on null characters. What is
> needed is a varbinary type, which stores binary data unformated, and spits
> out the binary data inside a PQResult. Some additional funtions are needed
> to read and write chunk of data inside that varbinary type.
>
> Any volunteer amongst the hackers ?
>
> I may try to do it as a used defined type inside a shared library, but I
> think PG as is may not handle it correctly...
>
> Cheers
> Franck(at)sopac(dot)org
>
>
Saludos... :-)
"And I'm happy, because you make me feel good, about me." - Melvin Udall
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Martín Marqués email: martin(at)math(dot)unl(dot)edu(dot)ar
Santa Fe - Argentina http://math.unl.edu.ar/~martin/
Administrador de sistemas en math.unl.edu.ar
-----------------------------------------------------------------
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Denis Perchine | 2000-10-10 12:46:50 | Re: Using BLOBs with PostgreSQL |
Previous Message | Martin A. Marques | 2000-10-10 12:09:52 | Re: Using BLOBs with PostgreSQL |