| From: | <bmccoy(at)chapelperilous(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jim Mercer <jim(at)reptiles(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Mike Sears <msears(at)vianet(dot)ca>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: postgres via shell scripts |
| Date: | 2000-10-06 17:42:49 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.10.10010061336480.5809-100000@chapelperilous.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Fri, 6 Oct 2000, Jim Mercer wrote:
> > There's pgbash, which might be what you want, but I've never tried it.
> > Of course psql works as well. Processing several output rows with more
> > than one field might pose a problem in any case.
>
> one day, i'm gonna hack up a pgawk.
>
> i think that would be most awesome.
Heh, while yer at it, how about pgsed, pgyacc, pglex, pggrep, etc.? You
could have all of your familiar tools tailored to do postgres!
Brett W. McCoy
http://www.chapelperilous.net
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
panic: kernel trap (ignored)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Adam Lang | 2000-10-06 17:55:29 | image storing |
| Previous Message | Adam Lang | 2000-10-06 17:05:03 | Image storing |