Re: -F option, RAM usage, more...

From: "Dominic J(dot) Eidson" <sauron(at)the-infinite(dot)org>
To: Mitch Vincent <mitch(at)venux(dot)net>
Cc: Mike Biamonte <mike(at)dbeat(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)hub(dot)org
Subject: Re: -F option, RAM usage, more...
Date: 2000-10-04 18:50:56
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.10.10010041350050.7307-100000@morannon.the-infinite.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Wed, 4 Oct 2000, Mitch Vincent wrote:

> That's what it does when -F is *not* used, right? -F disables calling
> fsync() after each transaction, right?..

Yes, sorry - when -F is _not_ used, fsync() _is_ called after each
transaction - when -F _is_ used, fsync() is _not_ called.

Sorry for the mixup.

--
Dominic J. Eidson
"Baruk Khazad! Khazad ai-menu!" - Gimli
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.the-infinite.org/ http://www.the-infinite.org/~dominic/

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Neil Conway 2000-10-04 20:24:02 Re: -F option, RAM usage, more...
Previous Message Mitch Vincent 2000-10-04 18:44:29 Re: -F option, RAM usage, more...