| From: | Peter Vazsonyi <neko(at)kredit(dot)sth(dot)szif(dot)hu> |
|---|---|
| To: | Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Re: [GENERAL] SPI & file locations |
| Date: | 2000-05-30 10:44:48 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.10.10005301209400.22917-200000@kredit.sth.szif.hu |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Hmmm...
I'm attached a small patch. This patch includes the list of dirs and
headers refered by spi.h (And _not_ more)
On Sat, 27 May 2000, Lamar Owen wrote:
> On Sat, 27 May 2000, Tom Lane wrote:
> > My whole problem with the spi.h-imports-88-headers business is that it
> > exposes in gory detail the fact that *we have absolutely no idea* what
> > we consider an exported backend interface and what we don't. I don't
Yes, but _before_ somebody create the new (more structural?) header layout,
must all spi-developer search for this files?
> Yes, this is a problem. And, yes, it needs to be taken care of in a
> designed, methodical manner -- the spi.h header should only need a few
> things (I, like you, have not done any SPI development yet to see what
> really _is_ needed....).
--
nek;(
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| heads.patch | text/plain | 8.3 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Vince Vielhaber | 2000-05-30 10:48:06 | Re: Postgresql usage clip. |
| Previous Message | Horák Daniel | 2000-05-30 10:40:02 | RE: Postgresql usage clip. |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew McMillan | 2000-05-30 11:23:44 | Using BOOL in indexes |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2000-05-30 10:04:10 | Re: Configuration and build clean-up |