Re: [HACKERS] Proposed change to the JDBC driver

From: Peter Mount <peter(at)retep(dot)org(dot)uk>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Proposed change to the JDBC driver
Date: 2000-01-24 18:18:24
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.10.10001241816480.4761-100000@maidast.retep.org.uk
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, 24 Jan 2000, Tom Lane wrote:

> Peter Mount <peter(at)retep(dot)org(dot)uk> writes:
> > As I haven't seen any replies to this, can I assume no body objects to me
> > making this fairly major change to the driver?
>
> AFAICS, it's not "major" in the sense of a functionality change, it's
> just that each calling app will need to replace "postgresql" with
> "org.postgresql"?

Correct.

> If you're gonna do it, 7.0 seems like the right time to do it.

That's exactly why I wanted to do it now.

Peter

--
Peter T Mount peter(at)retep(dot)org(dot)uk
Main Homepage: http://www.retep.org.uk
PostgreSQL JDBC Faq: http://www.retep.org.uk/postgres
Java PDF Generator: http://www.retep.org.uk/pdf

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2000-01-24 18:20:04 Re: [HACKERS] Re: pg_dump possible fix, need testers.
Previous Message Tom Lane 2000-01-24 18:17:57 Re: AW: [HACKERS] Some notes on optimizer cost estimates