From: | Andy Lewis <alewis(at)roundnoon(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | kaiq(at)realtyideas(dot)com |
Cc: | Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>, Karel Zak - Zakkr <zakkr(at)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>, pgsql-sql <pgsql-sql(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Datetime operators (was: Re: [SQL] Another Date question) |
Date: | 1999-12-03 19:43:32 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.05.9912031343060.16046-100000@rns.roundnoon.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-sql |
Remove the ::timespan and it will.
Andy
On Fri, 3 Dec 1999 kaiq(at)realtyideas(dot)com wrote:
> why
>
> create table mymy (mydate datetime default (now() + '60 days'::timespan ));
>
> does not work?
>
> On Fri, 3 Dec 1999, Thomas Lockhart wrote:
>
> > > > I'd like to create a table with a datetime field that defaults to +60
> > > > days.
> > > > mydate datetime default 'now() +(at)60 days',
> > > > ...
> > > Where is a problem?
> >
> > You have enclosed your default values into a large string, rather than
> > letting them be evaluated as an expression:
> >
> > mydate datetime default (now() + '60 days')
> >
> > where the outer parens are optional.
> >
> > > datetime + '10 day' or
> > > datetime + '2 year' ..etc.
> > > But I'm not sure what is better or exists it in other SQL.
> >
> > afaik this is the simplest and most direct way to do it. Note that you
> > can include other timespan fields in the constant:
> >
> > mydate datetime default (now() + '60 days 10 hours')
> >
> > HTH
> >
> > - Thomas
> >
> > --
> > Thomas Lockhart lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu
> > South Pasadena, California
> >
> > ************
> >
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thomas Lockhart | 1999-12-03 19:57:15 | Re: Geometric Data Type in PostgreSQL |
Previous Message | kaiq | 1999-12-03 19:43:06 | Re: Datetime operators (was: Re: [SQL] Another Date question) |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thomas Lockhart | 1999-12-03 20:03:27 | Re: Datetime operators (was: Re: [SQL] Another Date question) |
Previous Message | kaiq | 1999-12-03 19:43:06 | Re: Datetime operators (was: Re: [SQL] Another Date question) |