From: | Oleg Broytmann <phd(at)emerald(dot)netskate(dot)ru> |
---|---|
To: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | [GENERAL] database access authentication: crypted passwords |
Date: | 1999-08-02 12:37:32 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.04.9908021634400.11722-100000@emerald.netskate.ru |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi!
For the first question, I remember hackers had decided not to implement
it - it is more important to send crypted passwords over the wires, right?
Oleg.
----
Oleg Broytmann http://members.xoom.com/phd2/ phd2(at)earthling(dot)net
Programmers don't die, they just GOSUB without RETURN.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Sun, 1 Aug 1999 15:40:03 +0400 (MSD)
From: Dmitry Morozovsky <marck(at)rinet(dot)ru>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: [GENERAL] database access authentication: crypted passwords
Hello there.
Is there any workable solutions to use crypt()ed passwords in pg_shadow?
And, is there a plan to differentiate postgres super-user from other
superusers, so that they, e.g., cannot change other superusers records in
pg_shadow (only their own and non-superuser records)?
Thanx in advance.
Sincerely,
D.Marck [DM5020, DM268-RIPE, DM3-RIPN]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck(at)rinet(dot)ru ***
------------------------------------------------------------------------
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Oleg Broytmann | 1999-08-02 12:42:03 | [GENERAL] read-only databases |
Previous Message | John Ridout | 1999-08-02 08:59:16 | Optimizer hints |