From: | Oleg Broytmann <phd(at)emerald(dot)netskate(dot)ru> |
---|---|
To: | Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> |
Cc: | "'Oleg Bartunov'" <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>, "'hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Postgres 6.5 beta2 and beta3 problem |
Date: | 1999-06-10 09:13:11 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.04.9906101311090.7341-100000@emerald.netskate.ru |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 10 Jun 1999, Thomas Lockhart wrote:
> I had some discussions on the list a while ago (6 months?) about this
> topic, but never really got feedback from "locale-using" people that
> NATIONAL CHARACTER and collation sequences are an acceptable solution.
What feedback do you want? I am pretty sure two Olegs on this list are
ready to continue the discussion.
> istm that Postgres' extensibility would make this *very* easy to
> implement and extend, and that then everyone would get the same
> behavior from CHAR while being able to get the behaviors they need
> from a variety of other character sets.
>
> I do have an interest in implementing or helping with something, but
> since I don't have to live with the consequences of the results
> (coming from an ASCII country :) it seemed to be poor form to push it
> without feedback from others...
>
> - Thomas
>
> --
> Thomas Lockhart lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu
> South Pasadena, California
Oleg.
----
Oleg Broytmann http://members.xoom.com/phd2/ phd2(at)earthling(dot)net
Programmers don't die, they just GOSUB without RETURN.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Meskes | 1999-06-10 09:40:27 | Foreign Keys |
Previous Message | Daniel Kalchev | 1999-06-10 09:05:45 | Re: [HACKERS] Postgres 6.5 beta2 and beta3 problem |