Re: [HACKERS] Current TODO list

From: Peter T Mount <peter(at)retep(dot)org(dot)uk>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Current TODO list
Date: 1999-05-18 18:08:58
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.04.9905181908310.3493-100000@maidast.retep.org.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, 18 May 1999, Tom Lane wrote:

> Peter T Mount <peter(at)retep(dot)org(dot)uk> writes:
> > This was done (twice if I remember). The tables now split at 1G. This
> > opened a new problem that vacuum can't handle segmented tables. I have the
> > general idea of how to fix this, but again it's time that's the problem.
>
> Ole Gjerde <gjerde(at)icebox(dot)org> just contributed a patch for the vacuum
> problem. Perhaps you at least have time to check his patch?

Will do.

Peter

--
Peter T Mount peter(at)retep(dot)org(dot)uk
Main Homepage: http://www.retep.org.uk
PostgreSQL JDBC Faq: http://www.retep.org.uk/postgres
Java PDF Generator: http://www.retep.org.uk/pdf

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter T Mount 1999-05-18 20:22:59 I thought this was picked up ages ago?
Previous Message Michael Meskes 1999-05-18 17:56:31 Re: [HACKERS] Current TODO list