Re: [INTERFACES] Bug in psql?

From: Bruce Tong <zztong(at)laxmi(dot)ev(dot)net>
To: leif(at)danmos(dot)dk
Cc: pgsql-interfaces(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] Bug in psql?
Date: 1999-05-11 12:50:07
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.04.9905110846330.30630-100000@laxmi.ev.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-interfaces

> I tried to create the table below using psql, but it bombed out
> with a message about loosing the backend, though the backend was
> still running nicely. It seems to be a problem with the long
> field name of the serial (and primary key) column.

Have you tried putting the following into a file and using...

# psql -f foo.sql

... to run it? I _think_ this sometimes gives different messages than
entering it directly on the psql command line, although I'm not sure why.
I could be way off here, but its worth a try.

> create table globalafvigelse
> (
> globalafvigelse serial ,
> startdato date,
> slutdato date,
> dagskema varchar(50),
> primary key (globalafvigelse)
> );

What is type "serial"? It probably not incorrect, but I've not heard of it
before.

Bruce Tong | Got me an office; I'm there late at night.
Systems Programmer | Just send me e-mail, maybe I'll write.
Electronic Vision / FITNE |
zztong(at)laxmi(dot)ev(dot)net | -- Joe Walsh for the 21st Century

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-interfaces by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message leif 1999-05-11 13:21:33 Re: [INTERFACES] Bug in psql?
Previous Message Peter Mount 1999-05-11 10:11:42 RE: [INTERFACES] Java and PGSQL date question