Re: [HACKERS] "CANNOT EXTEND" -

From: Peter T Mount <peter(at)retep(dot)org(dot)uk>
To: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: perdue(at)raccoon(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)hub(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] "CANNOT EXTEND" -
Date: 1999-03-17 23:17:11
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.04.9903172312050.16622-100000@maidast.retep.org.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, 15 Mar 1999, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> [Charset iso-8859-1 unsupported, filtering to ASCII...]
> > Thanks Bruce.
> >
> > Do you have any idea what happens with pg_dump when it hits 2GB??? Is it set
> > up to segment the files on linux? If not, I may have hit a brick wall here,
> > and have no way to back this baby up.
> >
>
> pg_dump only dumps a flat unix file. That can be any size your OS
> supports. It does not segment. However, a 2gig table will dump to a
> much smaller version than 2gig because of the overhead for every record.

Hmmm, I think that, as some people are now using >2Gig tables, we should
think of adding segmentation to pg_dump as an option, otherwise this is
going to become a real issue at some point.

Also, I think we could do with having some standard way of dumping and
restoring large objects.

--
Peter T Mount peter(at)retep(dot)org(dot)uk
Main Homepage: http://www.retep.org.uk
PostgreSQL JDBC Faq: http://www.retep.org.uk/postgres
Java PDF Generator: http://www.retep.org.uk/pdf

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1999-03-17 23:23:18 Re: [HACKERS] "CANNOT EXTEND" -
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 1999-03-17 23:09:03 Re: [HACKERS] New postgres -O option for system tables