Re: [HACKERS] NT port

From: Peter T Mount <peter(at)retep(dot)org(dot)uk>
To: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
Cc: Peter T Mount <peter(at)taer(dot)maidstone(dot)gov(dot)uk>, PostgreSQL Hacker <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] NT port
Date: 1998-12-02 06:50:49
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.04.9812020648220.682-100000@maidast.retep.org.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, 1 Dec 1998, The Hermit Hacker wrote:

> On Tue, 1 Dec 1998, Peter T Mount wrote:
>
> > Just a quick question. What is the current state of PostgreSQL on Windows
> > NT (yeuch).
> >
> > I'm asking, because I'm pushing PostgreSQL here, and their eye's lit up as
> > soon as they heared that someone has got it running (even partially
> > helps).
>
> To the best of my knowledge, the last report oabout it with NT was
> that it compiled out of the box using the Cygwin development package...
>
> If someone wants to build an NT binary package up of v6.4 to put
> on the WWW/FTP server, I will be quite happy to do so...same goes for any
> other platform, actually...just make sure you include a README.<platform>
> file so that ppl have some sort of base instructions...

hmmm, I have cygwin at work, I'll have a crack at a binary today.

--
Peter T Mount peter(at)retep(dot)org(dot)uk
Main Homepage: http://www.retep.org.uk
PostgreSQL JDBC Faq: http://www.retep.org.uk/postgres
Java PDF Generator: http://www.retep.org.uk/pdf

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Horak Daniel 1998-12-02 07:52:00 RE: [HACKERS] NT port
Previous Message Thomas G. Lockhart 1998-12-02 05:49:48 New Linux/libc5 CVSup client