From: | Kristofer Munn <kmunn(at)munn(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] SELECT...FOR UPDATE OF class_name |
Date: | 2000-01-16 15:30:27 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.04.10001161027160.711-100000@munn.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
>
> > ERROR: FOR UPDATE: relation tbl2 not found in FROM clause
>
> I believe the error message is correct; you should have written
>
> select 1 from tbl2 t2, tbl1 t1 where t1.id1 = t2.id1 and
> t2.id1 = 7 for update of t2;
>
> A lot of people do not realize that writing an alias for a table
> in FROM means that as far as all the rest of that query is concerned,
> that alias *is* the name of the table.
>
> [ additional comments and self-join example clipped ]
Ok, that sounds like a fine rule except for non-self-joins:
mail=> select 1 from tbl2 t2, tbl1 t1 where tbl1.id1 = t2.id1 and t2.id1 = 7 ;
^^^^^^^ ^^^^
Does not give any error. I had expected that behavior to be consistent
which is why I ran into the error. However, I have no problem with that
explanation.
- K
Kristofer Munn * KMI * 973-509-9414 * AIM KrMunn * http://www.munn.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Adrian Pach | 2000-01-16 15:36:52 | Credit Card ??????????? |
Previous Message | Oliver Elphick | 2000-01-16 15:10:34 | Re: [HACKERS] Problem with foreign keys and inheritance |