Re: [HACKERS] FOREIGN KEY and shift/reduce

From: Karel Zak - Zakkr <zakkr(at)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz>
To: Jan Wieck <wieck(at)debis(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL HACKERS <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] FOREIGN KEY and shift/reduce
Date: 1999-12-06 20:59:54
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.3.96.991206214515.18632A-100000@ara.zf.jcu.cz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On Mon, 6 Dec 1999, Jan Wieck wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Another interesting question is about inheritance. If a
> REFERENCES constraint exists for a table, must another table,
> inheriting this one, also get all the FK checks applied?

Hi,

This inspire me for next question: What is in PosgreSQL inherited?

IMHO is problem make inheriting FOREIGN KEY if not is support for UNIQUE
or PRIMARY KEYs inheriting. (Or is it in CVS tree?).

PostgreSQL 6.5.3:

test=> create table aaa (x int4 UNIQUE);
NOTICE: CREATE TABLE/UNIQUE will create implicit index 'aaa_x_key' for
table 'aaa'
CREATE
test=> create table y () inherits (aaa);
CREATE
test=> insert into y values (1);
INSERT 590807 1
test=> insert into y values (1);
INSERT 590808 1

Karel

PS. I very look forward to a FOREIGN KEY, with this feature will
life easier and the PgSQL will more tread on the heels of non-GNU
engines.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 1999-12-06 21:40:03 Multibyte in autoconf
Previous Message Ansley, Michael 1999-12-06 20:05:54 RE: [HACKERS] RAW I/O device