From: | Peter T Mount <peter(at)retep(dot)org(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | PostgreSQL Interfaces List <pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | New JDBC Driver Patch |
Date: | 1998-10-07 21:31:04 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.3.96.981007222624.496b-100000@maidast.retep.org.uk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-interfaces |
I've just posted to the patches list, a patch that finally brings Thread
safety to the driver.
This is mainly of use for Servlet authors, as they don't need to manage a
pool of open connections any more, but they can use a single connection
without the risk of the backend getting confused.
The patch accomplishes this by syncronising network activity to the
PG_Stream object, which is unique for each active connection. Both the
Connection.ExecSQL() and FastPath.fastpath() methods do this, and so far,
my tests haven't yet broken it.
Peter
--
Peter T Mount peter(at)retep(dot)org(dot)uk
Main Homepage: http://www.retep.org.uk
PostgreSQL JDBC Faq: http://www.retep.org.uk/postgres
Java PDF Generator: http://www.retep.org.uk/pdf
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jun Kuwamura | 1998-10-08 08:51:38 | [pgsql-jp 5574] Re: Is array_iterator.c work? (fwd) |
Previous Message | Joris Esch | 1998-10-07 12:46:00 | RE: libpq++ and gcc |