Re: [HACKERS] CVS and the backend

From: Peter T Mount <peter(at)retep(dot)org(dot)uk>
To: t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers List <hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] CVS and the backend
Date: 1998-08-06 05:57:31
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.3.96.980806065514.793H-100000@maidast.retep.org.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, 6 Aug 1998 t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp wrote:

> >I've just run CVS UPDATE again, in another attempt to get initdb to run.
> >Anyhow, I noticed that there was a message saying that there were
> >conflicts. Any ideas?
>
> initdb no more exists, instead initdb.sh added. Does this have any
> relation to the confilicts?

Just to check, I removed initdb from the source, as well as the files that
had the conflicts. Reran cvs update, and it checked out initdb, so it's
still there.

Anyhow, cvs doesn't report any conflicts now, so that's working. initdb
seems to hang for a few minutes when creating pg_user:

vacuuming template1
creating public pg_user view
mv: /usr/local/dbase/data/base/template1/xpg_user: No such file or
directory

--
Peter T Mount peter(at)retep(dot)org(dot)uk or petermount(at)earthling(dot)net
Main Homepage: http://www.retep.org.uk
PostgreSQL JDBC Faq: http://www.retep.org.uk/postgres

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas G. Lockhart 1998-08-06 05:59:48 Re: [HACKERS] indexes and floats
Previous Message Peter T Mount 1998-08-06 05:47:14 Re: [HACKERS] SPI procedure for removing large objects