| From: | Marin D <marin(at)cybernet(dot)bg> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jerome ALET <alet(at)unice(dot)fr> |
| Cc: | patrice(at)idf(dot)net, pgsql-sql(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [SQL] nextval |
| Date: | 1998-05-28 10:38:26 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.3.96.980528133604.23872A-100000@server.iclub.techno-link.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-sql |
On Thu, 28 May 1998, Jerome ALET wrote:
>
> Yes, I already know that solution, but I wondered why mine was bad (the
> forgotten '') and finally I think I've found a (maybe already known) bug
> in CREATE RULE (look at the results in my previous message).
>
Who hasn't already found one? :)
the man page for create_rule clearly says
DESCRIPTION
The current rule system implementation is very brittle and
is unstable. Users are discouraged from using rules at
this time.
Best regards
Marin
-= Why do we need gates in a world without fences? =-
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jackson, DeJuan | 1998-05-28 14:49:16 | RE: [SQL] nextval |
| Previous Message | Jerome ALET | 1998-05-28 10:01:07 | Re: [SQL] nextval |