Re: [HACKERS] error on HAVING clause

From: "Jose' Soares Da Silva" <sferac(at)proxy(dot)bazzanese(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] error on HAVING clause
Date: 1998-04-10 14:55:10
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.3.96.980410143021.995A-100000@proxy.bazzanese.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, 9 Apr 1998, Bruce Momjian wrote:

Don't worry about time Bruce. I'm not in a hurry.
HAVING is an important feature. Finally SELECT statement is complete.
I would like to show you another thing about HAVING.

prova=> select sno,qty from sp group by sno,qty having qty = 300;
sno |qty
-----+---
S1 |100
S1 |200
S1 |300
S1 |400
S2 |300
S2 |400
S3 |200
S4 |200
S4 |300
S4 |400
(10 rows)

prova=> select oid,sno,qty from sp group by sno,qty having qty = 300;
oid|sno |qty
------+-----+---
147004|S1 |100
147001|S1 |200
147000|S1 |300
147002|S1 |400
147006|S2 |300
147007|S2 |400
147008|S3 |200
147009|S4 |200
147010|S4 |300
147011|S4 |400
(10 rows)

Solid give me another result. Who are rigth ?

SOLID SQL Editor (teletype) v.02.20.0007
select sno,qty from sp group by sno,qty having qty = 300;
SNO QTY
--- ---
S1 300.
S2 300.
S4 300.
3 rows fetched.

Maybe this one is illegal, but it give me a strange output:

prova=> select oid,sno,qty from sp having qty = 300;
| | <---------where is the title ????
------+-----+---
147000|S1 |300
147001|S1 |200
147002|S1 |400
147003|S1 |200
147004|S1 |100
147005|S1 |100
147006|S2 |300
147007|S2 |400
147008|S3 |200
147009|S4 |200
147010|S4 |300
147011|S4 |400
(12 rows)
Jose'

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kent S. Gordon 1998-04-10 15:32:38 Re: [HACKERS] New pg_type for large object
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 1998-04-10 13:33:04 Re: [HACKERS] error on HAVING clause