| From: | teunis <teunis(at)mauve(dot)computersupportcentre(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Thomas G(dot) Lockhart" <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] (: JDBC+(Sun ~3:pm MST) CVS :) -also question about regression tests |
| Date: | 1998-02-02 19:35:49 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.3.96.980202123333.10783C-100000@sigil.computersupportcentre.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>
> Great. Then when they get this bug out it will work on Postgres without changes.
> I'll wait. If you want to pursue it on the glibc2 side and give them a patch
> perhaps they will fix the bug faster.
Okay - I'll bite. Where's the bug?
What part of the libs?
What function?
What behaviour?
And you're right - the documentation rules where functions are defined.
(And the documents are Unix98 - not any particular OS.... though BSD
should be a good reference for most :) [but not all]
If there's a real problem there's a real path to tell the people how to
fix it :)
[and I have full gcc/egcs/glibc/... source on my computer so can look it
up...]
G'day, eh? :)
- Teunis
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | The Hermit Hacker | 1998-02-02 19:37:30 | Re: [HACKERS] (: JDBC+(Sun ~3:pm MST) CVS :) -also question about regression tests |
| Previous Message | teunis | 1998-02-02 19:29:25 | Re: [HACKERS] (: JDBC+(Sun ~3:pm MST) CVS :) -also question about regression tests |