Re: Re: versioning question

From: Matthew Hixson <hixson(at)poindextrose(dot)org>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Re: versioning question
Date: 2001-04-18 18:04:47
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.3.96.1010418110251.26701A-100000@zoso.notwork.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Ah, thank you. I wasn't sure what the rc stood for. Thought it might
have been additional updates since 7.1 like how the Linux kernel will have
ac patchlevels whenever Alan Cox makes small updates.
-M@

--
There are more things in heaven and earth,
Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy.

On Wed, 18 Apr 2001, Mitch Vincent wrote:

> 7.1 is a release (the latest), 7.1rc4 is a *Release Candidate*.
>
> -Mitch
> Software development :
> You can have it cheap, fast or working. Choose two.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Matthew Hixson" <hixson(at)poindextrose(dot)org>
> To: <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2001 1:28 PM
> Subject: versioning question
>
>
> > Which is the most recent version of Postgres, 7.1 or 7.1rc4 ?
> > Thanks,
> > -M@
> >
> > --
> > There are more things in heaven and earth,
> > Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy.
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> > TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
> >
> > http://www.postgresql.org/search.mpl
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/search.mpl
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-04-18 18:35:43 Re: 7.1 bug fix question
Previous Message P. A. Bagyenda 2001-04-18 18:01:21 corrupted database?