From: | Karel Zak <zakkr(at)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz> |
---|---|
To: | "Riebs, Andy" <Andy(dot)Riebs(at)compaq(dot)com> |
Cc: | "'Poul L(dot) Christiansen'" <poulc(at)cs(dot)auc(dot)dk>, Uro Gruber <uros(dot)gruber(at)sir-mag(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | RE: Crash-me of PostgreSQL |
Date: | 2001-02-14 15:18:02 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.3.96.1010214160248.31439C-100000@ara.zf.jcu.cz |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Wed, 14 Feb 2001, Riebs, Andy wrote:
> > Someone is working on an open database-independent benchmarking tool.
> > Does anyone know the status of that project?
>
> See <http://osdb.sourceforge.net> for the home page of the "Open Source
> Database Benchmark." We have early "working code" for the callable versions
> of both PostgreSQL and MySQL, but it has NOT been rigorously reviewed yet,
> nor does it support recent MySQL functionality. It would be interesting, but
> not necessarily useful, to use osdb to compare PostgreSQL and MySQL at this
> time.
I still not understand what all compare, ... compare full dymamic/modular
PostgreSQL with static features (types, functions ..) in MySQL?
The MySQL must be always faster - if not - MySQL developers are greenhorns -
but it isn't feasible.
May be compare availability for some specific usage -- an example web
application, multi-user assecc vs. locks ..etc., but some common tests
say nothing.
Karel
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alfonso Peniche | 2001-02-14 15:25:12 | Re: Bad book review |
Previous Message | Fred Yankowski | 2001-02-14 15:15:50 | Re: Bad book review |