| From: | Karel Zak - Zakkr <zakkr(at)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bryan White <bryan(at)arcamax(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-interfaces(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [INTERFACES] The persistance of C functions |
| Date: | 2000-02-10 09:42:29 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.3.96.1000210103409.21359B-100000@ara.zf.jcu.cz |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-interfaces |
On Wed, 9 Feb 2000, Bryan White wrote:
> If I use CREATE FUNCTION for a C function in a .so file and then use the
> function and then change and recompile the function, what steps are needed
> to see the change?
>
> As I see it the options are:
> A: do nothing, the function is reloaded on every invocation.
> B: Reopen the connection to the backend
> C: Restart the postmaster
>
> I suspect B is correct but I would like to hear someone confirm it.
'B' is right - the postgreSQL not has any persisten cache for this, and
if you restart connection a backend reload this information again.
Or you can drop/(re)create a function, it is total safe solution.
Karel
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Hannu Krosing | 2000-02-10 10:12:04 | Re: AW: [HACKERS] Another nasty cache problem |
| Previous Message | Horák Daniel | 2000-02-10 09:19:28 | RE: [HACKERS] Small update for WinNT port |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ansley, Michael | 2000-02-10 13:22:09 | LO using ODBC/Access |
| Previous Message | Dave Page | 2000-02-10 09:14:14 | RE: [INTERFACES] pgAdmin on NT (NT4SP6) |