Re: [HACKERS] How PG parser search (build-in) function?

From: Karel Zak - Zakkr <zakkr(at)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] How PG parser search (build-in) function?
Date: 2000-01-13 16:04:28
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.3.96.1000113165409.30099A-100000@ara.zf.jcu.cz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On Thu, 13 Jan 2000, Tom Lane wrote:

> Karel Zak - Zakkr <zakkr(at)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz> writes:
> > I have a question... How PG parser select (build-in) function?
> > Check parser function's arguments datetypes only or check returns value
> > datetype too (for function searching in system cache ..etc)?
>
> The argument types have to be different. In general, the parser
> doesn't *know* what the return type of the function is; it has to
> discover that by looking up the function. So you can't have two
> functions of the same name unless they differ in number and/or type
> of arguments.

Well, we must use the numeric version of to_number() only and parser
must cast from numeric itself (but IMHO it is not effective convert in
to_number() string to numeric and in parser convert numeric to other
datetype. But if it not possible.. :-(

Thank!

Karel

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2000-01-13 16:34:31 Re: [HACKERS] FETCH without FROM/IN
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2000-01-13 16:02:14 initdb (Re: [HACKERS] TODO list updated)