From: | Peter T Mount <psqlhack(at)maidast(dot)demon(dot)co(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | M(dot)Boekhold(at)et(dot)tudelft(dot)nl |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Proposal for async support in libpq |
Date: | 1998-04-18 10:40:45 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.3.95.980418113946.7910C-100000@maidast.demon.co.uk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, 18 Apr 1998, Maarten Boekhold wrote:
> Wasn't the problem with OOB data that java doesn't support this? I
> remember that OOB data has come up before on this list a long time ago,
> and that at that time some java bloke (peter?) started to complain :)
I said at the time, that I wasn't certain that Java did or didn't support
it. Since then, I have noticed references to it, but I've lost them since.
I'm delving into the docs as I type, looking for this.
--
Peter T Mount petermount(at)earthling(dot)net or pmount(at)maidast(dot)demon(dot)co(dot)uk
Main Homepage: http://www.demon.co.uk/finder
Work Homepage: http://www.maidstone.gov.uk Work EMail: peter(at)maidstone(dot)gov(dot)uk
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Mattias Kregert | 1998-04-18 14:18:27 | Re: [HACKERS] fsync -> fdatasync in backend/storage/file/fd.c |
Previous Message | Peter T Mount | 1998-04-18 10:37:07 | Re: [HACKERS] lock failed and buffer leak |