From: | Jonathan Bartlett <johnnyb(at)eskimo(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Matt Davies <matt(at)mattdavies(dot)net> |
Cc: | Martin Marques <martin(at)bugs(dot)unl(dot)edu(dot)ar>, <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Postgress and MYSQL |
Date: | 2004-01-14 21:37:09 |
Message-ID: | Pine.GSU.4.44.0401141333460.20569-100000@eskimo.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-general |
> Imagine this: more users, more installations, more (selective) development
> fingers. Not all users are rocket scientists, but the video game rule applies
> to many: if I can't get it going in X (user preference) minutes then it isn't
> worth the trouble. Should PG be limited to only those who are hard core DB
> users? If so, I don't think PG will take off as fast.
We need a Postgres vs MySQL Mailing list :)
Honestly PG is easy to get up and running on several distributions. On
RH, service postgres start willgive you a running Postgres (it will do an
initdb if needed). Now just create a user and get going.
PG is only hard because people _think_ it's going to be hard. Or because
it used to be hard. However, it hasn't been hard for a long time.
I also don't think "how fast will this take off" is necesarily a good
design requirement.
Jon
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Martin Marques | 2004-01-14 22:02:39 | Re: Postgress and MYSQL |
Previous Message | Robert Treat | 2004-01-14 21:22:52 | Re: Need PostgreSQL Person at LWE NYC 2004 |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Martin Marques | 2004-01-14 22:02:39 | Re: Postgress and MYSQL |
Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2004-01-14 21:36:12 | Re: Errors after power failure |