| From: | Jonathan Bartlett <johnnyb(at)eskimo(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Network Administrator <netadmin(at)vcsn(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Interfaces that support cursors |
| Date: | 2003-10-10 21:14:35 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.GSU.4.44.0310101411510.13045-100000@eskimo.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
> Absolutely- I was gonna dig into my mod_perl manual since I'm not sure if/how I
> can make the HTML interfaces persist in Apache- I know the backend can (Apache
> <-> Pg) but instead of increasing the complexity of things this time(all the
> script does is write pages of images), I'll see how the selects with
> offset/limit modifiers perform. I'm going to check our that Persistent Perl
> product for future reference too. Thanks.
>
PersistentPerl Kicks Butt! You can use the standard CGI stuff, and still
get the speed benefits of hacks like mod_perl. Most of my bigger web
applications take about 5seconds for perl to parse, which would make them
useless without PersistentPerl.
One site I built using PersistentPerl is http://store.wolfram.com/ - I
don't know if they still use it, but I don't see why they would have
changed. It was a beauty.
Jon
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Vivek Khera | 2003-10-10 21:18:25 | Re: Table partitioning for maximum speed? |
| Previous Message | Vivek Khera | 2003-10-10 21:14:25 | Re: go for a script! / ex: PostgreSQL vs. MySQL |