Re: Factoring where clauses through UNIONS take 2

From: Jonathan Bartlett <johnnyb(at)eskimo(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone23(dot)bigpanda(dot)com>, <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Factoring where clauses through UNIONS take 2
Date: 2003-04-25 03:52:32
Message-ID: Pine.GSU.4.44.0304242051580.19310-100000@eskimo.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Does this apply to NULLs as well?

Thank you for your extremely prompt, intelligent, and helpful replies.

Jon

On Thu, 24 Apr 2003, Tom Lane wrote:

> I said:
> > In this particular case, since the qual doesn't actually touch the
> > type-converted column, it would have been safe to push down, but the
> > planner doesn't make this test on a per-qual basis: if there are type
> > conversions anywhere in the UNION it just punts.
>
> CVS tip has now had its consciousness raised on this point ;-). Turns
> out that it's not significantly more expensive to apply the test to
> individual vars instead of having a blanket check on the whole query,
> so I fixed it.
>
> Jonathan will still need to put the explicit casts into his view for
> use with 7.3.*, though. He probably should do that anyway, because
> even in 7.4 a restriction on the "type" column would not get pushed
> down as desired if the literals are UNKNOWN type.
>
> regards, tom lane
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-04-25 03:57:16 Re: Factoring where clauses through UNIONS take 2
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-04-25 03:08:11 Re: Solaris