| From: | Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Matt Burke <mattblists(at)icritical(dot)com>, Scott Carey <scott(at)richrelevance(dot)com>, "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: suggestions for postgresql setup on Dell 2950 , PERC6i controller |
| Date: | 2009-02-06 18:49:21 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.GSO.4.64.0902061344540.10025@westnet.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Fri, 6 Feb 2009, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Stupid question, but why do people bother with the Perc line of cards if
> the LSI brand is better?
Because when you're ordering a Dell server, all you do is click a little
box and you get a PERC card with it. There aren't that many places that
carry the LSI cards either, so most people are looking at "get the PERC as
part of a supported package from Dell" vs. "have one rogue component I
bought from random reseller mixed in, complicating all future support
calls".
The failure in this logic is assuming that "support" from Dell includes
making sure the box actually performs well. If it works at any speed,
that's good enough for Dell.
--
* Greg Smith gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore, MD
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2009-02-06 21:50:08 | Re: inheritance, and plans |
| Previous Message | Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz | 2009-02-06 18:21:01 | Re: inheritance, and plans |