From: | Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Bart Grantham <bg(at)logicworks(dot)net> |
Cc: | "'pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Opteron vs. Xeon performance differences |
Date: | 2008-10-10 17:42:37 |
Message-ID: | Pine.GSO.4.64.0810101334140.204@westnet.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Thu, 9 Oct 2008, Bart Grantham wrote:
> The full story: we have an older production server with 2G of RAM,
> 2.4GHz Opterons w/ 1M of cache...The newer servers have 4G of RAM,
> 3.0GHz Xeons with 2M of cache.
Model numbers please? I can probably guess for the Opterons, there are a
lot of different implementations lumped under the Xeon brand name.
Have you taken compared how fast the RAM is in the two systems? We were
just talking about a similar unexpected performance different yesterday on
another list:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2008-10/msg00051.php
I'd be curious what memtest86+ and the simple hdparm -T benchmark say
about the two servers. If those numbers correlate with the performance
difference you're seeing, the PostgreSQL code might have nothing to do
with it. I've seen a 60% performance difference just between the best and
worst RAM I tried on a single motherboard recently.
--
* Greg Smith gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore, MD
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Shane Ambler | 2008-10-10 17:50:26 | Re: Opteron vs. Xeon performance differences |
Previous Message | Matthew T. O'Connor | 2008-10-10 17:06:36 | Re: Opteron vs. Xeon performance differences |