Re: Opteron vs. Xeon performance differences

From: Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>
To: Bart Grantham <bg(at)logicworks(dot)net>
Cc: "'pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Opteron vs. Xeon performance differences
Date: 2008-10-10 17:42:37
Message-ID: Pine.GSO.4.64.0810101334140.204@westnet.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Thu, 9 Oct 2008, Bart Grantham wrote:

> The full story: we have an older production server with 2G of RAM,
> 2.4GHz Opterons w/ 1M of cache...The newer servers have 4G of RAM,
> 3.0GHz Xeons with 2M of cache.

Model numbers please? I can probably guess for the Opterons, there are a
lot of different implementations lumped under the Xeon brand name.

Have you taken compared how fast the RAM is in the two systems? We were
just talking about a similar unexpected performance different yesterday on
another list:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2008-10/msg00051.php

I'd be curious what memtest86+ and the simple hdparm -T benchmark say
about the two servers. If those numbers correlate with the performance
difference you're seeing, the PostgreSQL code might have nothing to do
with it. I've seen a 60% performance difference just between the best and
worst RAM I tried on a single motherboard recently.

--
* Greg Smith gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore, MD

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Shane Ambler 2008-10-10 17:50:26 Re: Opteron vs. Xeon performance differences
Previous Message Matthew T. O'Connor 2008-10-10 17:06:36 Re: Opteron vs. Xeon performance differences