Intel's X25-M SSD

If like me you've been reading all the flash SSD drive reviews that come
out, you might have also noticed that the performance on write-heavy
workloads hasn't been too far ahead of traditional drives. It's typically
been hit or miss as to whether the SDD would really be all that much
faster on a real OLTP-ish database workload, compared to a good 10k or 15k
drive (WD's Velociraptor is the usual comparison drive).

That's over as of today: http://techreport.com/articles.x/15433/9

You can see what I was talking about above in their Database graph:
under heavy load, the Velociraptor pulls ahead of even a good performing
flash product (Samsung's FlashSSD), and the latency curve on the next page
shows something similar. But the Intel drive is obviously a whole
different class of SSD implementation altogether. It's not clear yet if
that's because of their NCQ support, or maybe the firmware just buffers
writes better (they should have tested with NCQ disabled to nail that
down).

With entry-level 64GB Flash drives now available for just under $200 (
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820227344 , price is
so low because they're closing that model out for a better V2 product)
this space is really getting interesting.

--
* Greg Smith gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore, MD