Re: [PATCHES] [0/4] Proposal of SE-PostgreSQL patches

From: Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] [0/4] Proposal of SE-PostgreSQL patches
Date: 2008-03-17 20:38:03
Message-ID: Pine.GSO.4.64.0803171633590.8820@westnet.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

On Mon, 17 Mar 2008, Gregory Stark wrote:

> Some people shout any time you send patches to -hackers.

Right, but if you note the improved version I give the thumbs-up to didn't
include any patches--just links to where you could get them. There's
little reason to include any code as an attachment for a proposal if you
can direct people to the web for them. That's why I suggested sending
"the minimum of files necessary", which in this case was zero.

--
* Greg Smith gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore, MD

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2008-03-17 20:47:56 Re: pgsql: Enable probes to work with Mac OS X Leopard and other OSes that
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2008-03-17 20:29:21 Re: Commit fest?

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-03-17 20:48:25 Re: UPDATE using sub selects
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2008-03-17 19:45:55 Re: DTrace probe patch for OS X Leopard