| From: | Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Linux v.s. Mac OS-X Performance |
| Date: | 2007-11-30 23:20:52 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.GSO.4.64.0711301815480.3906@westnet.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Fri, 30 Nov 2007, Lincoln Yeoh wrote:
> Anecdotal - I have found "smart" raid controllers to fail more often than
> dumb scsi controllers (or even SATA/PATA controllers), and some seem more
> failure prone than semi-decent operating systems.
You'd need to name some names here for this to mean too much. There are
plenty of positively miserable RAID controllers out there. I wouldn't
trust the cards from Adaptec, Promise, and Highpoint to correctly store a
database about what's in my pockets.
> What's more likely in most places is somebody powering down the server
> abruptly, and then fsync=off could hurt :).
Here you're hitting on the real point. If a proposed solution adds
potential for database corruption if someone trips over the server cord,
it's not really a solution at all.
--
* Greg Smith gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore, MD
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | seijin | 2007-11-30 23:28:33 | libeay32.dll and libpq.dll |
| Previous Message | Greg Smith | 2007-11-30 23:15:27 | Re: Linux v.s. Mac OS-X Performance |