| From: | Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Barcelona vs Tigerton |
| Date: | 2007-09-11 15:11:56 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.GSO.4.64.0709111107090.24969@westnet.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Tue, 11 Sep 2007, Mindaugas wrote:
> Now that both 4x4 out it's time for us to decide which one should be
> better for our PostgreSQL and Oracle.
You're going to have to wait a bit for that. No one has had both to
compare for long enough yet to reach a strong conclusion, and you're
probably going to need a database-specific benchmark before there's useful
data for your case. Yesterday's meta-coverage at Ars was a nice summary
of the current state of things:
http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20070910-barcelonas-out-and-the-reviews-are-out.html
--
* Greg Smith gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore, MD
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kevin Kempter | 2007-09-11 16:24:58 | More Vacuum questions... |
| Previous Message | Steinar H. Gunderson | 2007-09-11 14:57:24 | Re: DRBD and Postgres: how to improve the perfomance? |