From: | Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: transactional DDL |
Date: | 2007-08-14 18:48:46 |
Message-ID: | Pine.GSO.4.64.0708141437350.11206@westnet.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-www |
On Tue, 14 Aug 2007, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Speaking of which, we should make a big point of our transactional DDL as a
> feature. It's something that even some of the big proprietary DBs don't
> have.
Already working on it. Got a great example comparing PG against MySQL
sent to me off-list, once I get permission I'll put that up and we can see
if someone wants to add Oracle/MS-SQL/etc. examples using the same format.
Going to add a section on this to the PG/MySQL document, which by the way
now has a permanent home at http://www.postgresql.org/docs/techdocs.83
All of the feedback I've gotten since the techdocs conversion will be
applied to that soon, the version of the document on the Wiki is turning
into a redirect.
--
* Greg Smith gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore, MD
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Decibel! | 2007-08-14 19:32:16 | Re: DBA-Village Poll |
Previous Message | Oleg Bartunov | 2007-08-14 18:44:42 | Re: default_text_search_config and expression indexes |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Greg Smith | 2007-08-14 21:23:33 | Re: transactional DDL |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-08-14 15:04:45 | Developer Section of main web site --- Coding |