Re: transactional DDL

From: Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>
To: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: transactional DDL
Date: 2007-08-14 18:48:46
Message-ID: Pine.GSO.4.64.0708141437350.11206@westnet.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-www

On Tue, 14 Aug 2007, Josh Berkus wrote:

> Speaking of which, we should make a big point of our transactional DDL as a
> feature. It's something that even some of the big proprietary DBs don't
> have.

Already working on it. Got a great example comparing PG against MySQL
sent to me off-list, once I get permission I'll put that up and we can see
if someone wants to add Oracle/MS-SQL/etc. examples using the same format.

Going to add a section on this to the PG/MySQL document, which by the way
now has a permanent home at http://www.postgresql.org/docs/techdocs.83

All of the feedback I've gotten since the techdocs conversion will be
applied to that soon, the version of the document on the Wiki is turning
into a redirect.

--
* Greg Smith gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore, MD

In response to

  • Re: L at 2007-08-14 14:31:30 from Josh Berkus

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Decibel! 2007-08-14 19:32:16 Re: DBA-Village Poll
Previous Message Oleg Bartunov 2007-08-14 18:44:42 Re: default_text_search_config and expression indexes

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Smith 2007-08-14 21:23:33 Re: transactional DDL
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2007-08-14 15:04:45 Developer Section of main web site --- Coding