| From: | Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL vs. MySQL: fight |
| Date: | 2007-08-04 05:26:27 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.GSO.4.64.0708040111040.11983@westnet.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On Sat, 4 Aug 2007, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
> Phew, this can go on for a while :)
My scope from the beginning was not to do a feature comparison. That's a
gigantic mess, and there are pages out there who cover that material
fairly well already. All I wanted to hit are the very basic SQL/engine
issues that tend to be misrepresented (often because the pages are
outdated) when comparing the performance/reliability tradeoffs of the main
database core of each system. Clustering, character sets, random features
that aren't key parts of the SQL spec--not really topical here.
Thanks to everyone who made suggestions about the join complexity section,
I expanded that section based on all the messages that went by today and
am happy now with how it covers that topic.
--
* Greg Smith gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore, MD
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Greg Sabino Mullane | 2007-08-04 13:56:31 | Re: We need an Advocacy wiki |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2007-08-03 23:25:50 | Re: PostgreSQL vs. MySQL: fight |