Re: pg_xlog - files are guaranteed to be sequentialy named?

From: Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_xlog - files are guaranteed to be sequentialy named?
Date: 2007-06-14 16:05:26
Message-ID: Pine.GSO.4.64.0706141159370.14861@westnet.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Thu, 14 Jun 2007, Frank Wittig wrote:

> But I also agree that if there is a possibility that times differ (and
> there of course is) the question is not if it can happen but when.

Sure, but it doesn't matter one bit if the times between the primary and
secondary servers differ. If the timestamps on the primary are being
preserved when copied over, the secondary can operate on them with no
reference whatsoever to its local time. Future transaction timestamps
will be all screwed up when you switch to the secondary if its clock is
wrong, but it doesn't impact the operation of the PITR mechanism or its
cleanup.

--
* Greg Smith gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore, MD

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bill Moran 2007-06-14 16:30:59 Re: DeadLocks..., DeadLocks...
Previous Message tom 2007-06-14 16:04:04 Re: DeadLocks...