Re: Seq scans status update

From: Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>
To: Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Seq scans status update
Date: 2007-05-29 01:50:47
Message-ID: Pine.GSO.4.64.0705282146090.28443@westnet.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

On Mon, 28 May 2007, Tom Lane wrote:

> But maybe that could be fixed if the clock sweep doesn't touch the
> usage_count of a pinned buffer. Which in fact it may not do already ---
> didn't look.

StrategyGetBuffer doesn't care whether the buffer is pinned or not; it
decrements the usage_count regardless.

--
* Greg Smith gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore, MD

In response to

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Smith 2007-05-29 02:21:54 Re: Logging checkpoints and other slowdown causes
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2007-05-29 00:35:34 Re: CREATE TABLE LIKE INCLUDING INDEXES support