From: | Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Feature Request --- was: PostgreSQL Performance Tuning |
Date: | 2007-05-02 01:52:16 |
Message-ID: | Pine.GSO.4.64.0705012134370.24215@westnet.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-performance |
On Mon, 30 Apr 2007, Kevin Hunter wrote:
> I recognize that PostgreSQL and MySQL try to address different
> problem-areas, but is this one reason why a lot of people with whom I
> talk prefer MySQL? Because PostgreSQL is so "slooow" out of the box?
It doesn't help, but there are many other differences that are as big or
bigger. Here are a few samples off the top of my head:
1) Performance issues due to MVCC (MySQL fans love to point out how
fast they can do select count(*) from x)
2) Not knowing you have to run vacuum analyze and therefore never seeing a
good query result
3) Unfair comparison of PostgreSQL with robust WAL vs. MySQL+MyISAM on
write-heavy worksloads
These are real issues, which of course stack on top of things like
outdated opinions from older PG releases with performance issues resolved
in the last few years.
--
* Greg Smith gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore, MD
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-05-02 02:48:44 | Re: multidimensional arrays |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2007-05-02 01:25:36 | Re: [GENERAL] Indice en Date |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Greg Smith | 2007-05-02 02:59:51 | Re: Feature Request --- was: PostgreSQL Performance Tuning |
Previous Message | david | 2007-05-01 23:48:33 | Re: Feature Request --- was: PostgreSQL Performance Tuning |