Re: @ versus ~, redux

On Sun, 3 Sep 2006, Joshua D. Drake wrote:

>
>> I can see various things that we might consider doing:
>>
>> 1. Just flip the names of the two operators added by the GIN patch.
>>
>> 2. #1 plus flip the names of the various contrib operators that are
>> out of sync (Michael Fuhr points out that contrib/intarray is out
>> of step too ... are there others?).
>>
>> 3. Leave the existing op names as-is in core and contrib, but consider
>> them deprecated and add new ops with consistently-chosen names.
>> (The new ops introduced by GIN should only exist with the new names.)

#3 looks good to me. Too many users. We should give them time for
upgrading. Probably, we need special chapter "To be obsoleted in the next
release" in Release notes.

>>
>> #1 isn't doing anything towards solving the underlying problem.
>> #2 has got obvious backwards-compatibility issues for contrib users.
>
> +1 on #2 with the following caveat. When we publish the release notes, we
> have a specific section that says:
>
> Compatibility changes from previous releases. Which IMHO should be there
> anyway as there are always compatibility issues from release to release.
>
> Joshua D. Drake
>
>

Regards,
Oleg
_____________________________________________________________
Oleg Bartunov, Research Scientist, Head of AstroNet (www.astronet.ru)
Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Moscow University, Russia
Internet: oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su, http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/
phone: +007(495)939-16-83, +007(495)939-23-83