From: | Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Deadlock with tsearch2 index ... |
Date: | 2005-05-31 22:22:18 |
Message-ID: | Pine.GSO.4.62.0506010218110.16737@ra.sai.msu.su |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 31 May 2005, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> The real solution is to upgrade GIST to be concurrent. Oleg and Teodor
> have made some noises about that in the past, but nothing's been done
> about it that I've heard of.
unfortunately, we still couldn't find 2-3 months for dedicated work on
concurrency&recovery for GiST. I'm trying to find support here in Russia
for our work.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
> (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org)
>
Regards,
Oleg
_____________________________________________________________
Oleg Bartunov, sci.researcher, hostmaster of AstroNet,
Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Moscow University (Russia)
Internet: oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su, http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/
phone: +007(095)939-16-83, +007(095)939-23-83
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2005-05-31 22:26:11 | Physical Tlist optimization still possible? |
Previous Message | Joe Conway | 2005-05-31 22:02:00 | Re: [SQL] ARRAY() returning NULL instead of ARRAY[] resp. |