From: | Evgeny Rodichev <er(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: win32 performance - fsync question |
Date: | 2005-02-17 18:56:59 |
Message-ID: | Pine.GSO.4.62.0502172155210.21926@ra.sai.msu.su |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
There are two different concerns here.
1. transactions loss because of unexpected power loss and/or system failure
2. inconsistent database state
For many application (1) is fairly acceptable, and (2) is not.
So I'd like to formulate my questions by another way.
- if PostgeSQL is running without fsync, and power loss occur, which kind
of damage is possible? 1, 2, or both?
- it looks like with proper fwrite/fflush policy it is possible to
guarantee that only transactions loss may occur, but database
keeps some consistent state as before (several) last transactions.
Is it true for PostgeSQL?
Regards,
E.R.
________________________________________________________________________e
Evgeny Rodichev Sternberg Astronomical Institute
email: er(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su Moscow State University
Phone: 007 (095) 939 2383
Fax: 007 (095) 932 8841 http://www.sai.msu.su/~er
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Merlin Moncure | 2005-02-17 19:14:00 | Re: win32 performance - fsync question |
Previous Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2005-02-17 18:36:31 | Re: win32 performance - fsync question |