Re:

From: "E(dot)Rodichev" <er(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>
To: "Matthew T(dot) O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su
Subject: Re:
Date: 2005-02-15 17:35:17
Message-ID: Pine.GSO.4.62.0502152028290.10468@ra.sai.msu.su
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, 15 Feb 2005, Matthew T. O'Connor wrote:

> Magnus Hagander wrote:
>
> Also, didn't someone recently report some very significant performance
> differences Windows networking QoS (Quality of Service) installed? You
> might try that.
>

It's unlikely. Postmaster listens loopback, AFAIK loopback does not
affected by any networking tuning and parameters. Additionally, during
pgbench test I have not any other network activity, hence QoS flag
looks unrelated for this problem.

Regards,
E.R.
_________________________________________________________________________
Evgeny Rodichev Sternberg Astronomical Institute
email: er(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su Moscow State University
Phone: 007 (095) 939 2383
Fax: 007 (095) 932 8841 http://www.sai.msu.su/~er

In response to

  • Re: at 2005-02-15 17:09:42 from Matthew T. O'Connor

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2005-02-15 18:03:20 Re:
Previous Message Matthew T. O'Connor 2005-02-15 17:09:42 Re: