Re: Adding a suffix array index

From: Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>
To: Troels Arvin <troels(at)arvin(dot)dk>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Adding a suffix array index
Date: 2004-11-19 13:35:06
Message-ID: Pine.GSO.4.61.0411191625160.24069@ra.sai.msu.su
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, 19 Nov 2004, Troels Arvin wrote:

> Hello Oleg,
>
> On Fri, 2004-11-19 at 15:35 +0300, Oleg Bartunov wrote:
>
>> your project looks very attractive.
>
> Thanks.
>
>> In principle, suffix array should be implemented using GiST framework.
>
> But in a previous conversation between the two of us, you wrote that the
> GiST wasn't suitable for this problem? I would very much like to use GiST

it's still true :( some problem with my english grammar.

> instead of having to create a whole new index infrastructure (if that's
> the alternative).
>
>> String Btree should be very useful for your problem.
>
> I thought that string b-trees were only usable for texts with natural
> stops (word boundaries), as opposed to very long, contiguous sequences. Am
> I mistaken?
>

I meant SB-Tree by Paolo Ferragina
http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/ferragina98string.html

>

Regards,
Oleg
_____________________________________________________________
Oleg Bartunov, sci.researcher, hostmaster of AstroNet,
Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Moscow University (Russia)
Internet: oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su, http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/
phone: +007(095)939-16-83, +007(095)939-23-83

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Zeugswetter Andreas DAZ SD 2004-11-19 13:38:59 Re: Can postgresql accept mutliple connections in the same instance?
Previous Message Troels Arvin 2004-11-19 13:23:34 Re: Adding a suffix array index