Re: with vs without oids in pg_catalog.*

From: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: with vs without oids in pg_catalog.*
Date: 2004-04-01 14:16:08
Message-ID: Pine.GSO.4.58.0404011611290.29898@elvis
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


Dear Bruce,

> > BTW, maybe you could reject some of the patches I submitted earlier,
> > rather than to simply ignore them?
>
> The only outstanding patch I see from you is:
>
> [PATCHES] [NOT] (LIKE|ILIKE) (ANY|SOME|ALL) (subquery...)
>
> from March 29. I will put it in the queue now. Are there others we
> missed?

Sure:-)

Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 09:09:40 +0100 (CET)
From: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>
To: PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: [PATCHES] hint infrastructure setup (v3)

Have a nice day,

--
Fabien Coelho - coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-04-01 14:20:03 Re: with vs without oids in pg_catalog.*
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2004-04-01 13:52:03 Re: with vs without oids in pg_catalog.*