Re: tsearch comments

On Tue, 28 Jan 2003, Uros Gruber wrote:

> Hi!
>
> I think that this would be nice. OpenFTS is great, but i would
> be great if this would be implement in real pg functions.
>
> I think that indexim would be great if pg make it by itself.
>
> Also it could be great if we could define order of weight of
> columns.

Could you elaborate this ?

>
> bye Uros
>
> I
> On 28.01.2003 at 11:53:26, Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>
> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 28 Jan 2003 sector119(at)mail(dot)ru wrote:
> >
> > > HI
> > >
> > > will we see sort by relevance at tsearch alpha version? :)
> > >
> >
> > not sure. We concentrate our efforts, well, Teodor is working
> > on
> > better configurability of tsearch like OpenFTS does.
> >
> > It\\\'s not difficult to add rather naive relevance based on
> > position
> > of lexem in document, for example. The question is do you
> like
> > such
> > kind of relevancy ? Real ranking support (as in OpenFTS)
> > require
> > separate tables to maintain coordinate information.
> > We want to keep tsearch as simple as it\\\'s and now we just
> add
> > better and friendly configurability. Do we need complicate
> > tsearch ?
> > We already have OpenFTS which has most features people
> > requested.
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org
>

Regards,
Oleg
_____________________________________________________________
Oleg Bartunov, sci.researcher, hostmaster of AstroNet,
Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Moscow University (Russia)
Internet: oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su, http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/
phone: +007(095)939-16-83, +007(095)939-23-83