From: | Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su> |
---|---|
To: | sector119(at)mail(dot)ru |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)stack(dot)net> |
Subject: | Re: tsearch comments |
Date: | 2003-01-28 10:47:04 |
Message-ID: | Pine.GSO.4.44.0301281337110.20835-100000@ra.sai.msu.su |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Tue, 28 Jan 2003 sector119(at)mail(dot)ru wrote:
> HI
>
> will we see sort by relevance at tsearch alpha version? :)
>
not sure. We concentrate our efforts, well, Teodor is working on
better configurability of tsearch like OpenFTS does.
It's not difficult to add rather naive relevance based on position
of lexem in document, for example. The question is do you like such
kind of relevancy ? Real ranking support (as in OpenFTS) require
separate tables to maintain coordinate information.
We want to keep tsearch as simple as it's and now we just add
better and friendly configurability. Do we need complicate tsearch ?
We already have OpenFTS which has most features people requested.
Regards,
Oleg
>
Regards,
Oleg
_____________________________________________________________
Oleg Bartunov, sci.researcher, hostmaster of AstroNet,
Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Moscow University (Russia)
Internet: oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su, http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/
phone: +007(095)939-16-83, +007(095)939-23-83
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Gordan Bobic | 2003-01-28 11:32:57 | Re: list server problems? |
Previous Message | Andrew Sullivan | 2003-01-28 10:39:03 | Re: A powerful dump utility |