From: | Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Shaun Thomas <sthomas(at)townnews(dot)com>, Gunther Schadow <gunther(at)aurora(dot)regenstrief(dot)org>, <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Critical performance problems on large databases |
Date: | 2002-04-11 18:31:07 |
Message-ID: | Pine.GSO.4.44.0204112129490.2819-100000@ra.sai.msu.su |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Thu, 11 Apr 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Oleg Bartunov wrote:
> > The big issue with LIMIT,OFFSET is that it still use all rows
> > for sorting. I already suggested to use partial sorting to avoid
> > sorting all rows if one selected only first 20 row, for example.
> > It's very important for Web applications because web users usually
> > read first 1-2 pages. Our experimnets have shown 6 times performance
> > win when using partial sorting.
>
> We do have this TODO item:
>
> * Allow ORDER BY ... LIMIT to select top values without sort or index
> using a sequential scan for highest/lowest values
>
looks too complex to me :-) I like partial sorting, but it's not
important.
>
Regards,
Oleg
_____________________________________________________________
Oleg Bartunov, sci.researcher, hostmaster of AstroNet,
Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Moscow University (Russia)
Internet: oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su, http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/
phone: +007(095)939-16-83, +007(095)939-23-83
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Oleg Bartunov | 2002-04-11 18:35:06 | Re: Critical performance problems on large databases |
Previous Message | Oleg Bartunov | 2002-04-11 18:28:48 | Re: Critical performance problems on large databases |