From: | Travis Bauer <trbauer(at)indiana(dot)edu> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Slashdot discussion |
Date: | 2000-07-11 17:06:45 |
Message-ID: | Pine.GSO.4.21.0007111203320.3686-100000@piccolo.cs.indiana.edu |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Once I ran into a guy who said that the postgres rpm was broken in Red Hat
5.2. This was when I was first getting into postgres. I spent some time
with it and realized that there were a number of things that had to be
done before it would work: creating the postgres users, initializing the
database, getting something into rc.d so it would boot up
automatically. The RPM was not broken, but it was a pain to get postgres
running unless you spent some time reading about it. My experience with
MySQL was less painful, although dealing with user permissions was more
complex.
----------------------------------------------------------------
Travis Bauer | CS Grad Student | IU |www.cs.indiana.edu/~trbauer
----------------------------------------------------------------
On Tue, 11 Jul 2000, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>
> Is anyone else noticing this: Everytime this sort of thing comes up a
> number of people invariably tell that they are using MySQL because it's
> easier to install, and that PostgreSQL is difficult ("a pain") to install.
>
> I've studied the MySQL installation instructions, and they don't strike me
> as inherently simpler. Is it only perception, or what can we do better?
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Guenter | 2000-07-11 17:11:11 | Benchmarks? |
Previous Message | Alex Bolenok | 2000-07-11 14:16:12 | PostgreSQL, ODBCExpress and locales |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-07-11 17:07:21 | Re: md5 again |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2000-07-11 17:01:26 | Re: md5 again |