| From: | Rich Teer <richard(dot)teer(at)rite-group(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Is PostgreSQL multi-threaded? |
| Date: | 2000-05-30 02:40:28 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.GSO.4.21.0005291933560.24272-100000@zen.rite-group.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Mon, 29 May 2000, Joseph Shraibman wrote:
> > Postgresql works under a multi-process model, it will take advantage
> > of multiple processors. However it not multi-threaded.
> >
> So in other words, it *is* multithreaded. It just uses heavyweight
> threads.
Thanks - but I did mean (light weight) threads, as opposed to processes.
I think the former can be more efficient than the latter - although perhaps
a bit more tricky to design well!
--
Rich Teer
NT tries to do almost everything UNIX does, but fails - miserably.
The use of Windoze cripples the mind; its use should, therefore, be
regarded as a criminal offence. (With apologies to Edsger W. Dijkstra)
If it ain't analogue, it ain't music.
Voice: +1 (250) 763-6205
WWW: www.rite-group.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Lincoln Yeoh | 2000-05-30 02:41:19 | Re: lots of large objects and toast |
| Previous Message | Joseph Shraibman | 2000-05-30 02:28:58 | Re: Is PostgreSQL multi-threaded? |