Re: Threaded PosgreSQL server

From: <mkscott(at)sacadia(dot)com>
To: Jeff Davis <list-pgsql-hackers(at)dynworks(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Threaded PosgreSQL server
Date: 2002-02-07 05:39:45
Message-ID: Pine.GSO.4.10.10202062130570.2665-100000@goldengate.kojoworldwide.com.
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, 6 Feb 2002, Jeff Davis wrote:

> I think in addition to pros/cons, an important question is:
> How has threading influenced other DBMS's? I know MySQL uses threading, at
> least in the development version; how much has it helped? Is the utility of a

I think threads was or is a big deal Informix (now IBM) Dynamic Server.
With a combination of multiple processes and threads it is able to spread a
query among multiple processors and recruit more resources for complex
queries.

Myron

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Haroldo Stenger 2002-02-07 05:43:42 Re: Threaded PosgreSQL server
Previous Message mkscott 2002-02-07 05:30:07 Re: Threaded PosgreSQL server